SEC: Three New Coaches
Jeremy Hillman | southeasternfootball.com
Hope is defined as “a general feeling that some desire will
be fulfilled.” This hopeful feeling was
lost a year ago, for the most part, by fans of three SEC programs. The losses mounted, no bowl invitations were
attained, and no rankings had been earned. Hope was fleeting. Doom was setting in. Change
was needed at
It was a time for change. Not just to change coaches, but to change directions and to try and reinstate some hope.
Each coaching change created a stir, among fans and media.
The new kids on the block in the Southeastern Conference
went to work right away. Each of them knew they had a lot of rebuilding to do.
Change is never easy. Slowly, but
surely, each of these coaches put together impressive staffs.
Flash Forward to Saturday October 31st :
With visions of bowl games, winning seasons and new respect, these coaching changes are beginning to look like a success early on. It is too early to tell, as recruiting must go well for these staffs and consistent winning is what will be expected by these programs. To keep things in perspective, it is tough as a first year coach to win in the SEC.
From 1994 through 2008, there have been 28 rookie coaches in the SEC. First year SEC coaches have gone 157-171-1 in that time span. That averages out to 5.7 wins and 6.1 losses per season, per first year coach. Works out to be almost a 6-6 record. Here are a few examples:
Bobby Petrino, Arkansas 2007: 5-7
Nick Saban, Alabama 2006: 6-6
Steve Spurrier, South Carolina 2005: 7-5
Rich Brooks, Kentucky
2003: 4-8
Mark Richt, Georgia 2001:
8-4
Lou Holtz,
Tommy Tuberville, Auburn 1995: 6-5
Jim Donnan,
Bottom line is it is not an easy task to take over an SEC
program, especially since many coaching changes leave the new coach with less
to work with than some of the veteran coaches of the league have in their
program. That is why
Would
Send me your thoughts, questions, rants and raves to SECpigskin@gmail.com or find me on twitter at /SECpigskin
SEC Top Stadiums
Jeremy Hillman| Southeasternfootball.com

For SEC fans, their school’s home stadium is a monument. It is a cathedral. It is a place of worship for Saturday afternoons and evenings. A house that holds memories of the jubilance of victory, and the gut-wrenching pain of losing. Memories of players, and coaches, and fans. Good memories. This house is sacred. Make no mistake, this house is “home”.
Each home stadium has its own feel and its own
uniqueness. Fans from
I have traveled to every SEC Stadium at least once, and have been able to experience each football venue. Using that experience, and some factual data, I will attempt to rank the stadiums in the conference. I ranked the 12 football stadiums in four categories: size (ranked by stadium capacity), noise (ranked by how loud the crowds get), aesthetics (ranked by the look of the stadium), and home field advantage (ranked by home record the last 9 years, 2000-2009). Here is how they rank in order:
Size ranking: 5th (88,548 seats)
Noise ranking: 1st
Aesthetics ranking: 2nd
Home field advantage ranking: 2nd (49-9)
Overall ranking average: 2.5
Size ranking: 2nd (92,746)
Noise ranking: 6th
Aesthetics ranking: 1st
Home field advantage ranking: 3rd (47-10)
Overall ranking average: 3
Size ranking: 1st (102,037)
Noise ranking: 3rd
Aesthetics ranking: 5th
Home field advantage ranking: 5th (45-16)
Overall ranking average: 3.5
Size ranking: 3rd (92,400)
Noise ranking: 2nd
Aesthetics ranking: 9th
Home field advantage ranking: 1st (54-10)
Overall ranking average: 3.75
Size ranking: 6th (87,451)
Noise ranking: 4th
Aesthetics ranking: 3rd
Home field advantage ranking: 4th (51-13)
Overall ranking average: 4.25
Size ranking: 4th (92,138)
Noise ranking: 5th
Aesthetics ranking: 4th
Home field advantage ranking: 7th (43-21)
Overall ranking average: 5
Size ranking: 7th (80,250)
Noise ranking: 7th
Aesthetics ranking: 6th
Home field advantage ranking: 8th (39-22)
Overall ranking average: 7
Size ranking: 8th (72,000)
Noise ranking: 9th
Aesthetics ranking: 8th
Home field advantage ranking: 5th (45-20)
Overall ranking average: 7.75
Size ranking: 10th (60,580)
Noise ranking: 8th
Aesthetics ranking: 11th
Home field advantage ranking: 9th (36-24)
Overall ranking average: 9.5
Size ranking: 9th (67,942)
Noise ranking: 11th
Aesthetics ranking: 10th
Home field advantage ranking: 10th (29-31)
Overall ranking average: 10
Size ranking: 12th (39,773)
Noise ranking: 12th
Aesthetics ranking: 7th
Home field advantage ranking: 12th (20-38)
Overall ranking average: 10.75
Size ranking: 11th (55,082)
Noise ranking: 10th
Aesthetics ranking: 12th
Home field advantage ranking: 11th (25-31)
Overall ranking average: 11
There is clearly “no place like home”, but for some teams that is more true than others. In just 75 days, these cathedrals of college football will be jam packed with fanatic fans, with more SEC memories, heroes and emotions to be made.
Note: This ranking is reflective of the stadium, and not the program. But it is clear, that nice facilities, including great stadiums, are found at the top programs in the conference. Look for this ranking to change over the next decade as teams add too, refurbish and win in their stadiums. The race to have the biggest and best stadium won’t end anytime soon.
Let me know your thoughts below, or on the message boards!
